1. Objectifs

Intentions :
« This chapter presents the results of a Quebec study (Simard, 2007) that focused on the factors associated with the family reunification of adolescents placed in residential care and group homes. We identify and discuss the principal factors that emerged in the context of relevant literature. Following our discussion of results, directions for future research are suggested. » (p. 245)

2. Méthode

Échantillon/Matériau :
« In order to determine factors associated with family reunification, the study compared two equal-sized groups of care leavers: 51 who were returned to their own home […] and 51 who left care but did not go home […]. » (p. 247)

Instruments :
Questionnaire

Type de traitement des données :
Analyse statistique

3. Résumé

« The results regarding the association between the length of placement and family reunification speak in favor of starting family reunification planning as soon as youth enter out-of-home care. The entry can be a key moment with respect to the process of returning home (Bullock, Littele, & Millham, 1993). By preparing for and planning the exit from the very beginning of placement, whether it is family reunification or an alternative plan. This would also make possible the early identification of those who are likely to achieve family reunification and those for whom that probability is low. With adequate planning for the end of placement, the adolescents and families aiming for reunification will be more likely to achieve it, and those adolescents obliged to look at other alternatives, including independent living, will also benefit from a better preparation for that crucial transition. In conclusion, we argue that it is important to change the way adolescents in substitute care are viewed and treated. These vulnerable young people are not a priority for policy-makers, even if some will find themselves literally in the street at age 18. Once they are placed, they and their families need enhanced support services to allow them to develop in a positive manner. » (p. 256-257)