1. Objectifs

Intentions :
This article attempts «to present the interdisciplinary model utilized in the implementation of a parental coordination project in Montreal, Canada, some highlights of the results of this pilot project and the recommendations that ensued.» (p. 169)

2. Méthode

Échantillon/Matériau :
«The research team conducted a longitudinal study with pre- and post-measures and collected quantitative data (psychometric measures) as well as qualitative data, which allows for a richer understanding of the experiences of the participants involved in the pilot project. […] Parents and children were met by researchers on two occasions (at the start and at the end of the intervention) and administered standardized questionnaires. [I]nterviews were also conducted (post-intervention) with children, parents, judges and the two PCs [parent coordinator]. As for lawyers, they were asked to fill out an online survey.» (p. 167)

Instruments :
- Guide d’entretien semi-directif
- Questionnaire

Type de traitement des données :
Analyse de contenu
Analyse statistique

3. Résumé

«Overall, the professionals involved (lawyers, judges, PCs) expressed a positive opinion of the parenting coordination process and were convinced that, certainly, this service could be of great assistance to high conflict families and that it has a place in the Quebec judicial system. Children, for the most part, also felt positive about their experience and were enthused about the opportunity to take part in a process that involved them and their parents. About half of these children reported having seen improvements with regard to the level of conflict and communication between their parents. This is noteworthy since the ultimate goal of parenting coordination is to contribute to the well-being of children by reducing conflict and improving co-parenting relations. […] The view of most parents (with the exception of three) were somewhat more negative, as they mostly felt that the parenting coordination process did not reduce the level of conflict with their co-parent and, in some instances, made things worse. However, most parents also believed in the value of having a PC available to help separated families living in conflict. Some felt, however, that the lack of any decision-making powers on the part of the PC did not allow for any change to take place and progress to be made.» (p. 168)