Integrating the Perspective of Vulnerable Heterosexual Male Adolescents to Prevent Premature Paternity and Sexually Transmitted Infection

Integrating the Perspective of Vulnerable Heterosexual Male Adolescents to Prevent Premature Paternity and Sexually Transmitted Infection

Integrating the Perspective of Vulnerable Heterosexual Male Adolescents to Prevent Premature Paternity and Sexually Transmitted Infection

Integrating the Perspective of Vulnerable Heterosexual Male Adolescents to Prevent Premature Paternity and Sexually Transmitted Infections

| Ajouter

Référence bibliographique [1808]

Manseau, Hélène, Blais, Martin, Engler, Kim et Bossé, Marie-André. 2008. «Integrating the Perspective of Vulnerable Heterosexual Male Adolescents to Prevent Premature Paternity and Sexually Transmitted Infection ». American Journal of Sexuality Education, vol. 2, no 4, p. 43-66.

Fiche synthèse

1. Objectifs


Intentions :
«This article’s objective is [...] to present a portrait of the sexual and parenting experience of especially vulnerable male adolescents in order to identify the main considerations that should guide sexual education adapted to this group.» (p.47)

2. Méthode


Échantillon/Matériau :
24 adolescents résidant dans un centre jeunesse de réhabilitation de la région de Montréal, qui ont rapporté avoir conçu un enfant ou avoir contracté une maladie transmise sexuellement à la suite de relations sexuelles non protégées.

Instruments :
Guide d’entretien semi-directif

Type de traitement des données :
Analyse de contenu

3. Résumé


«This study presents the perspective of vulnerable Canadian (Quebecker) adolescents defined as such on account of their numerous experiences with potential or actual fatherhood or exposure to sexually transmitted infection. The interviews allowed youth to talk about their experiences with paternity, their sex lives and their views on sex education. The recurrent themes in their accounts were: (1) a felt inability to face fatherhood; (2) sexual expression (heterosexual) as a means of establishing masculinity; (3) resistance towards condom use; (4) idealized yet difficult love relationships; and (5) a need for dynamic sex education that covers love and eroticism. Based on these analyses, guidelines for sex education are proposed.» (p.43)