Failure to Reproduce: Assisted Reproductive Technology Policy in Canada

Failure to Reproduce: Assisted Reproductive Technology Policy in Canada

Failure to Reproduce: Assisted Reproductive Technology Policy in Canada

Failure to Reproduce: Assisted Reproductive Technology Policy in Canadas

| Ajouter

Référence bibliographique [13187]

Snow, Dave. 2014. «Failure to Reproduce: Assisted Reproductive Technology Policy in Canada». Thèse de doctorat, Calgary, Université de Calgary, Département de science politique.

Accéder à la publication

Fiche synthèse

1. Objectifs

Intentions :
«Comparative political science concerning assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) has faced two problems: first, it has not adequately defined the field; second, it has focused almost exclusively on policy produced by national governments. This dissertation uses Canada as a case study to demonstrate how a new six-part typology for ART policy, coupled with a focus on multiple policymakers, can produce greater clarity. It uses historical institutionalism to trace Canadian policy, and finds that the 1993 Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies – a “critical juncture” – engaged in constitutionally unstable framing strategies that shaped policy for decades to come.» (p. ii)

Questions/Hypothèses :
«Why […] was Canada so unsuccessful in its major national attempt to institutionalize its ART policy? [W]hy were federal policymakers and constitutional experts so confident they would win a judicial challenge to the legislation on federalism grounds? And why were they so mistaken?» (p. 3) «What about surrogacy, which is technically a private social arrangement rather than a “technology,” although it is obviously heavily reliant on assisted reproductive technologies? Should “surrogacy” policy, which obviously affects the already mentioned “parentage policy,” be included in ART policy?» (p. 7)

2. Méthode

Échantillon/Matériau :
Données documentaires diverses

Type de traitement des données :
Réflexion critique

3. Résumé

«This constitutionally risky strategy was confirmed in 2010 when a majority of Supreme Court justices struck down much of the Assisted Human Reproduction Act for violating provincial jurisdiction. In the face of this sub-optimal policy outcome, provincial governments, courts, and medical organizations have engaged in considerable policymaking concerning surrogacy, parentage, and assisted conception policy. While much of Canadian ART policy constitutes a “patchwork” of prohibitions, regulations, common law rulings, and clinical guidelines, it is a mistake to call it “unregulated.” The Canadian case study provides several conclusions for comparative scholars. First, combining the six-part typology with a focus on multiple policymakers can better explain ART policy variation within and across regimes. Second, policy framing strategies must take into account existing institutional structures; how actors frame jurisdictional responsibilities can matter as much as how they frame policy content. Finally, scholars should pay more attention to how ideas become (or do not become) institutionalized. While policy framing can create ideational path dependence, the actual transfer from ideas to institutions often requires more than legislation.» (p. ii-iii) Ce mémoire compare les lois sur la maternité par substitution et la parentalité entre les provinces canadiennes.